Antares Marine Consultants, Inc.

Antares Marine Consultants, Inc. Marine & Cargo Surveyors Antares Marine Consultants Inc. Our highly qualified staffs are available seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day.

At Antares Marine Consultants Inc., we specialize in various types of Marine, Cargo & Engineering Surveys, Loading & Discharging Ships, Cargo & Container Surveys, Pre-shipment Inspection, Draft Surveys, Loading & Discharging Dangerous Goods, Heavy Lifts & Project Cargo. handles at an average of 165 vessels per year ranging from steel ship, bulk carrier, container, general cargo & petroleum vessel

s in Quebec, Ontario and South American Ports. It employs Master Mariners & Chief Engineers who worked & carried out survey jobs for successful companies in Canada, U.S.A & Singapore. Our Surveyors are also available on short notice for any port in the world. Our interim report follows with 24 hours by email. Original and copies of final report are submitted with supporting documents and color photographs.

01/18/2026

Implementation of the Grain Code Amendment (MSC.552(108)) in Canadian Ports
Regulatory Interpretation, Practical Application, and Inspection Implications

1. Background and Regulatory Context
The International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk (hereinafter referred to as the Grain Code), originally adopted under Resolution MSC.23(59), establishes mandatory stability and loading requirements for vessels carrying grain cargoes.
On 23 May 2024, the International Maritime Organization adopted Resolution MSC.552(108), introducing a significant amendment to the Grain Code. This amendment formally recognizes a new grain loading configuration intended to address long-standing operational and practical challenges encountered during grain loading operations.
The amendment enters into force on 1 January 2026 and applies to new or renewed grain loading approvals issued on or after that date.

2. Transitional Application and Validity of Existing Documentation
2.1 Vessels Holding Existing Documents of Authorization
Vessels holding a valid and unexpired Document of Authorization (DoA) issued under the pre-amendment Grain Code may continue to load grain cargoes until the expiry of the existing DoA, provided that:
• No major structural or stability-affecting modifications have been made, and
• Grain is loaded only in configurations already approved in the vessel’s existing Grain Stability Booklet.
In Canadian ports, Transport Canada Marine Safety does not prohibit grain loading solely because a vessel has not transitioned to the amended Grain Code, provided the existing DoA remains valid and applicable.

3. New Grain Loading Configuration Introduced by MSC.552(108)
3.1 Definition of the New Loading Condition
The amendment introduces a formally recognized loading condition described as:
“A specially suitable compartment, partly filled in way of the hatch opening, with ends untrimmed.”
As defined in section A.2.8 of the amended Code, this configuration means that:
• The compartment is specifically designed and approved for this loading pattern;
• The cargo space is not filled to the maximum extent under the hatch opening;
• The grain level reaches at least the bottom edge of the hatch end beams;
• Outside the periphery of the hatch opening, the grain may remain at its natural angle of repose, in accordance with section A.10.4;
• Full levelling below deck, normally required for partly filled compartments, is not mandatory for this configuration.

4. Operational Rationale for the Amendment
The new loading configuration reflects operational realities frequently encountered in bulk grain trade, including but not limited to:
• Discrepancies between declared and actual stowage factors;
• Shortfall in cargo quantity at completion of loading;
• Under-keel clearance restrictions;
• Ballasting and deballasting limitations;
• Terminal equipment constraints affecting trimming efficiency, particularly below deck.
Prior to the amendment, such conditions often resulted in non-compliant loading arrangements that could not be satisfactorily corrected at the end of loading.

5. Mandatory Stability Data and Grain Loading Manuals
5.1 Pre-Approval Requirement
The amendment does not permit ad-hoc use of the new loading configuration.
To load grain under this arrangement, the vessel’s approved grain stability information must already include the necessary supporting data, as required under section A.6.3 of the Code.
5.2 Required Technical Data
The approved Grain Stability Booklet or Grain Loading Manual must include:
a. Stability Curves and Tables
• Curves or tables of hypothetical volumetric heeling (inclining) moments for the relevant hold(s);
• Curves or tables showing:
o Grain volume versus height; and
o Corresponding vertical centres of gravity (VCG).
b. Approved Practical Examples
• Sample loading plans demonstrating at least one hold loaded in the new configuration;
• Examples covering both departure and arrival conditions.
5.3 Unchanged Requirements
• All assumptions in Part B of the Grain Code remain applicable;
• Existing onboard stability software does not require modification solely due to this amendment.
In practical terms, if the new loading configuration is not already approved and documented, it cannot be used.

6. Continued Role of the Document of Authorization (DoA)
The Document of Authorization remains the primary statutory instrument governing grain loading approval.
6.1 Post-2026 Compliance Requirement
From 1 January 2026, Canadian port authorities will require:
• A valid DoA explicitly reflecting compliance with MSC.552(108); and
• An updated Grain Loading Manual approved by the Flag Administration or a Recognized Organization.
A vessel that technically complies with the amended Grain Code but does not hold a renewed or re-issued DoA will not be permitted to load grain.
Demonstrated compliance without formal approval is insufficient.

7. Canadian Grain Calculation Forms and Documentation
As of the date of writing:
• Transport Canada has not issued a new standardized national grain calculation form specific to MSC.552(108);
• Canadian ports continue to accept:
o Stability calculations prepared in accordance with the amended Grain Code, and
o Calculations approved by the vessel’s Administration or Classification Society.
Any future changes are expected to be promulgated through Ship Safety Bulletins (SSBs).

8. Inspection and Port State Control Implications
Cargo inspectors may encounter three distinct situations:
8.1 Situation 1 – Approved Configuration
• Stability booklet includes the new loading configuration;
• Inspector may assess stability normally;
• Ready for Loading (RTL) and Fitness to Proceed (FTP) may be issued.
8.2 Situation 2 – Unapproved Configuration Before Loading
• Stability booklet does not include the new configuration;
• RTL will be refused;
• Loading in the new configuration will not be permitted.
8.3 Situation 3 – Unapproved Configuration After Loading
• Vessel is found loaded in an unapproved configuration;
• FTP will be refused;
• The master must take corrective action, which may include unloading and re-loading in accordance with approved conditions.
Such situations may lead to operational delays, additional costs, and commercial disputes.

9. Practical Guidance for Owners, Masters, and Surveyors
To ensure uninterrupted grain operations in Canadian ports:
• Apply early for renewal or re-issuance of the DoA;
• Ensure the DoA explicitly references MSC.552(108);
• Update Grain Loading Manuals or attach approved addenda;
• Confirm loading configurations are approved before commencement;
• Maintain close coordination with:
o Flag Administration,
o Classification Society, and
o Terminal operators.

10. Conclusion
The Grain Code amendment under MSC.552(108) introduces necessary operational flexibility while reinforcing the fundamental principle of prior approval and documented stability compliance.
In Canadian ports, grain loading approval will remain documentation-driven, with inspectors relying on approved stability information and a valid Document of Authorization rather than operational intent or post-loading justification.

Kamal Ahmed (15N)
Port Warden
Port of Quebec City

01/16/2012

Cargo Declaration Forms – Bulk Cargoes That May Liquefy - Safety Alert - The Standard P&I ClubThe Standard P&I Club issued Standard Cargo - Bulk Cargo Liquefaction (Iron Ore Fines and Nickel Ore) in February 2011 and since then the situation has not improved; in fact it appears to have got worse. Dry bulk cargoes that are prone to liquefaction, such as iron ore fines and nickel ore, are continuing to be mis-declared by shippers as Group C cargoes (which neither liquefy nor possess chemical hazards) under the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code. This is a serious and potentially major hazard to the safety of crew and ship. ^ Surveyor sampling bulk cargo The correct classification for cargoes under the IMSBC Code that are liable to liquefy is found under Group A. The countries where shippers have been known to mis-declare or wrongly classify dry bulk cargoes include, but are not limited to:IndonesiaChinaPhilippinesIndiaBrazilUkraineVenezuelaSince the beginning of this year, the club has seen an increase in irregularities relating to iron ore fines being loaded in Brazilian ports. Cargoes with high moisture contents are presented for loading and on the cargo declaration forms are wrongly classified as Group C cargoes. As a result, ships have suffered cargo liquefaction in their holds, with the moisture contents in excess of the transportable moisture limit (TML) and reaching it's flow moisture point (FMP). This has been confirmed at the discharge ports. Ports in Brazil such as Ponta da Madeira and Santana are of particular concern, especially for iron ore fines declared as 'sinter feed ore' with no certificates of moisture content or transportable moisture limit presented before loading. 'Sinter feed ore' has since been identified as iron ore fines and can be considered as a Group A cargo (liable to liquefy). Recent cases of owner's challenging the shipper over the veracity of the cargo declaration form have resulted in the cargo being re-classified as a Group C cargo. Furthermore, independent surveyors acting for owner's interests have been refused access for pre-loading surveys and subsequent authorization for the survey denied by shippers. ^ Liquefied sinter feed ore Examples of this have occurred in Brazil, Indonesia and the Philippines. Owners should consider clausing their charter parties to include that all statutory provisions of the IMSBC Code be followed and that owners stipulate their right to have an independent surveyor in attendance. Shippers in Brazil are now under pressure to reclassify their cargoes correctly according to the provisions of the IMSBC Code. The Code must be complied with at all times. Masters must be on their guard to ensure that the cargo to be loaded is correctly classified. Certificates of moisture content must be issued for Group A cargoes, and the interval between sample or testing and loading should not exceed seven days. Certificates of transportable moisture limit must also be issued, with the interval between sample or testing and loading not exceeding six months. However, if it is suspected that the moisture content may have increased since the time of testing or that the flow moisture properties of the cargo may have changed, possibly resulting from heavy rainfall or inefficient stockpiling, additional testing should be carried out to confirm the safety and suitability of the cargo to be loaded. Frequently asked questions about cargoes tHat may liquefy (group a under imsbc code)1.What should I do if there is insufficient data provided on the cargo declaration form and on moisture content and transportable moisture limit certificates?Under the terms of the IMSBC Code, the shipper should provide the master with appropriate information on the cargo far enough in advance of loading to enable precautions to be put into effect for proper stowage and safe carriage of the cargo. If the shipper provides what is suspected to be an inaccurate or falsified cargo declaration form or certificates of moisture content and transportable moisture limit, the cargo should not be loaded until it can be verified that it is safe to load and that the certification is in accordance with the IMSBC Code. The master should contact the company along with the P&I club and local correspondent to assist in providing support and, if necessary, arrange for a cargo surveyor to attend the ship and assist the master. If there are any doubts as to the safety and suitability of the cargo, the shipper should be requested to provide accurate certification, which may involve retesting the cargo for moisture content and transportable moisture limit. The master is reminded that under the provisions of Safety of Life At Sea (SOLAS), cargo should not be loaded if there are any concerns that the ship might be affected by the condition of the cargo. ^ Water seen in the tracks of a bulldozer during trimming of sinter feed ore at Santana, Brazil 2. What should I do if I spot significant water on the surface of the cargo in the ship's hold or on the stockpiles on shore?Consider to stop loading cargo. The presence of water on the surface of the cargo could indicate that the moisture content is in excess of its transportable moisture limit. Inform the shipper of the condition of the cargo and that you have observed water. Contact your P&I club and local correspondent for assistance. Arrange for a cargo surveyor to attend and to check the condition of the cargo. Instruct the surveyor to take samples and arrange for retesting of the cargo by an independent laboratory to determine if the cargo is in excess of its transportable moisture limit and has reached its flow moisture point. If retesting determines that the cargo is in excess of its TML (thus presenting a serious risk of liquefaction) the remaining cargo should not be loaded. On no account should the ship sail with any cargo which has excessive moisture and which exceeds its transportable moisture limit. It can take as little as one or two cargo holds of liquefied cargo to capsize a ship and that not all holds need liquefied cargo to have a negative effect on positive stability. ^ Bulldozer trimming sinter feed ore inside a cargo hold at Santana, Brazil 3. What should the cargo surveyor's duties include when assisting the master?The surveyor should check the condition of the holds (charterers may have appointed a separate surveyor to check the condition of holds for suitability of loading). In particular, he should ascertain the cleanliness of the hold, including any residual moisture or water present. Holds should be clean and dry ahead of loading. ^ Bulldozer trimming sinter feed ore inside a cargo hold at Santana, Brazil The surveyor should if possible check the condition of the cargo on shore and determine its suitability for loading, noting any moisture present or contamination and whether it accurately corresponds with the descriptions on the cargo declaration form and bill of lading. Cargo stockpiles for loading need to be clearly identified and related to the cargo documentation. The surveyor should keep in close contact with the master and crew. The cargo plan should be closely monitored to ensure that the shoreside facilities are loading in accordance with the agreed plan. ^ Sinter feed ore with high moisture content The surveyor should take owner's samples of the cargo from various stockpiles on shore in accordance with the IMSBC Code procedures, in the event that it is necessary to double check the shipper's certification.If the cargo is wet or unrepresentative of the shipper's cargo declaration, samples taken by the owner's surveyor should be taken to an independent laboratory for retesting and confirmation of suitability to load. The surveyor should pay particular attention to the prospect of rain and how this could affect the cargo to be loaded, including:advising the master to close the working cargo hatches when it rains for prolonged periodsrechecking the cargo stockpile on shore to determine whether the rain has affected the cargo - has this changed the flow moisture properties of the cargo and increased the moisture content?additional testing if the cargo has become wet. It is essential that the cargo is retested to determine if it is safe for transportadvising the master of any wet cargo - the surveyor may assist the master in conducting a 'can test'. This test should only be used to determine whether the condition of a cargo is NOT suitable for loading and should never be regarded as an acceptance test or that the cargo is safe to load.If cargo is to be loaded from barges:that the barges have proper certification for loading (cargo declaration form, moisture content and transportable moisture limit certification) in line with the IMSBC Code requirementsthat there is effective monitoring of barges, particularly relating to the stockpile from which the cargo originatesbe wary of barges going from ship to ship with a poor quality cargo until they find one that will accept it for loadingbe wary of barges arriving at ship's side at night, as the darkness may hide problems with the cargo that would be easily seen in daylight, such as dampness or poor grade quality Appointment of a cargo surveyor does not relieve the shipper of his obligations under the IMSBC Code or local regulations. ^ Can test showing a sample of iron ore fines with signs of water

Key pointscargo declaration forms must be accurate and representative of the cargo to be loaded. This includes:- the correct bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN)- the cargo group (A and B, A, B or C)- IMO class and UN number if applicable- total amount of cargo to be loaded- stowage factor- trimming procedure- toxic or flammable gases which may be generated by cargo- cargo flammability, toxicity, corrosiveness and propensity to oxygen depletion- self-heating properties of the cargoIf there is any doubt as to the validity or veracity of cargo declaration forms or certificates of moisture content or transportable moisture limited, the local P&I correspondent should be contacted for further assistanceMasters and ships' officers should have a good understanding and knowledge of the cargo to be loaded, including the ability to identify any signs of potential liquefaction problemsThe IMSBC Code has been mandatory since 1 January 2011 and must be complied with by both the ship and the shipperThe master has an overriding authority under SOLAS not to load any cargo and to stop loading, if there are any concerns that the ship may be affected by the condition of the cargo.When fixing the cargo or ship, chartering departments must identify the cargo accurately as per the IMSBC Code by providing the bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN) of the cargo. If this is not done, seafarers' lives could be at risk. Author: Chris SpencerDirector of Loss Prevention, The Standard P&I Club

01/16/2012

to ASI, PSC

IMO Secretary-General urges rapid and full casualty investigationBriefing: 02/2012, January 16, 2012

Page ContentIMO Secretary-General Koji Sekimizu has expressed his condolences and sympathy for all those caught up in tragic accidents involving ships over the weekend.Speaking at the opening of the IMO Sub-Committee on Stability, Load Lines and Fishing Vessel Safety today (16 January 2011) Mr Sekimizu said, “I wish to express my sincere condolences and sympathy on behalf of IMO to the families of those who have lost their lives the cruise ship Costa Concordia.”“Further, I appreciate the Italian Coast Guard for their rescue operations over the night of the accident and the continued efforts deploying patrol boats, tugs, helicopters as well as diver teams, which have resulted in the highest number of people rescued in the history of the Italian Coast Guard.”“Causes of this accident are still not yet established. We must wait for the casualty investigation and should not pre-judge or speculate at this stage. I would like to urge the Flag State administration to carry out the casualty investigation covering all aspects of this accident and provide the findings to the IMO under the provisions of SOLAS as soon as possible,” he said.He added “IMO must not take this accident lightly. We should seriously consider the lessons to be learnt and, if necessary, re-examine the regulations on the safety of large passenger ships in the light of the findings of the casualty investigation.”“In the centenary year of the Titanic, we have once again been reminded of the risks involved in maritime activities.”___ IMO – the International Maritime Organization – is the United Nations specialized agency with responsibility for the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of marine pollution by ships. Web site: www.imo.org

01/05/2012

Another Hazardous Cargo, Another Sinking Wednesday, January 4, 2012By: Clay MaitlandOn Christmas day, the bulk carrier VINALINES QUEEN, carrying a cargo of nickel ore from Morowali, Indonesia to China, went missing. The ship and its crew of 22 must now be considered lost. Although it is certainly too soon to ascribe a known cause of sinking, it is probably fair to say, as an American judge did many years ago: “Sometimes circumstantial evidence can be very convincing, just as when you find a trout floating in the milk”. There continues to be a crying need for greater information, understanding and enforcement of regulations – as well as testing – of cargoes that may liquefy. Nickel ore is one such. Intercargo, the International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners, has commendably been a leader in fighting for international action to protect the lives of seafarers, at risk when bulk cargo vessels, like the Supramax VINALINES QUEEN, suddenly disappear. Over the years, many such losses involved vessels carrying direct reduced iron (DRI), a cargo prone to heating when wet, sometimes resulting in a disastrous explosion. It took many years for international authorities to recognize the culpability of unscrupulous shippers and consignees – one of our industry’s little secrets. It will be recalled that in December of 2010, three bulk carriers and their crews were lost, all as a result of cargo liquefaction. The danger hasn’t gone away. There is a need for stronger and clearer requirements particularly with respect to accurate information on the carriage of bulk cargoes. The IMO has held meetings, most recently last September, of its Sub-Committee on Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargoes and Containers (DSC), with many participants, including Intercargo, The International Group of P&I Clubs, The International Union of Marine Insurers, as well as other industry associations, to take further action strengthening the requirements of the existing IMSBC Code. A prepared schedule for nickel ore will be further reviewed this coming March, before – hopefully – its inclusion in the IMSBC Code at the forthcoming Dangerous Goods Sub-Committee in September. The safety terminology of hazardous cargoes uses the term “Competent Authority”. Usually, such an Authority is either a shipper at the port of loading, or receiver at the point of destination. Rob Lomas, the Secretary General of Intercargo has called for “…the reassurances of the Competent Authorities in…exporting countries that their procedures and processes have integrity and transparency so that this message is received and most importantly, trusted by the shipowners. Competent Authorities are key to ensuring that seafarers’ lives are not put in danger”.It is also clear that bulker losses like that of the VINALINES QUEEN are taking place within specific trades, and with similar destinations in the Far East. It would be very helpful if the International Maritime Organization (IMO) could study these specific trades, with the objective of getting the word out on hazardous bulk cargoes. Many of the ships that have been lost have crews and flag states that are not likely to have gotten the necessary information on the risks involved, and the measures that need to be taken, in handling dangerous or difficult cargoes. The VINALINES QUEEN was built in 2005, and from all available information was in satisfactory condition. Its loss is another tragedy that didn’t need to happen. Source: The Maritime Executive (MarEx)

Positional changes at IMO SecretariatJanuary 3, 2012 After taking office on 1 January 2012, the IMO Secretary-General Mr...
01/04/2012

Positional changes at IMO SecretariatJanuary 3, 2012


After taking office on 1 January 2012, the IMO Secretary-General Mr. Koji Sekimizu today announced a number of changes in the structure of the IMO Secretariat.Mr. Sekimizu said: “The biggest challenge I see in the coming years, in terms of management of the Organization, is how to improve the ‘delivery mechanism’ in the Secretariat to address the demanding issues we face, such as anti-piracy measures, the introduction of the mandatory Member State Audit Scheme and our ever-increasing workload. To address this will require effective human resource deployment and redeployment, the creation of new ways of handling our work and improvements to our working methods. It will also require close co-operation between the Secretariat and Member Governments.”In order to meet the future challenges, Mr. Sekimizu transferred Assistant Secretary-General, Mr. Andrew Winbow, from the Administrative Division to the Maritime Safety Division, as its Director. Mr. Sekimizu further transferred Mr. Jo Espinoza-Ferrey from the Marine Environment Division to head the Administrative Division as its Director, and consequentially promoted Mr. Stefan Micallef to the post of Director of the Marine Environment Division.To ensure that the Organization makes further progress dealing with piracy, Mr. Sekimizu appointed Mr. Hartmut Hesse as Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Maritime Security and Anti-Piracy Programmes. Mr. Hesse will be taking responsibility for the implementation of the Djibouti Code of Conduct and will also act as the IMO representative to conferences and meetings dealing with piracy issues. In order to prepare for the successful introduction of the mandatory Member State Audit Scheme and to provide ample resources for these activities, Mr. Sekimizu has reorganized the Sub-Division for Implementation and Coordination of the Maritime Safety Division into a Department for Member State Audit and Implementation Support in the Maritime Safety Division. Mr Laurence Barchue was appointed as Head of the new Department. Finally, the Secretary-General also decided to strengthen the functions dealing with internal audit and matters of ethics and appointed Mr. K-R. Min as the Senior Deputy Director in charge of the Internal Oversight and Ethics Office.The changes announced also results in a changed composition of the Senior Management Committee which aims to provide the leadership necessary for a revitalized and forward-looking Organization, as indicated below: Secretary-GeneralAssistant Secretary-General/Director, Maritime Safety Division, A. Winbow
Assistant Secretary-General/Director, Legal and External Relations Division, R. Balkin
Director, Conference Division, O. O’Neil
Director, Technical Cooperation Division, J. Zhu
Director, Administrative Division, J. Espinoza Ferrey
Director, Marine Environment Division, S. MicallefSpecial Adviser on Environmental Protection Standards, D. Du
Head, Department of Member State Audit and Implementation Support, L. Barchue
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Maritime Security and Anti-Piracy Programmes, H. Hesse
Senior Deputy Director, Internal Oversight and Ethics Office, K-R. Min
Head, Executive Office of the Secretary-General, J. Thompson
Head, Policy and Planning Unit, J. Loldrup___________Source: IMO Web site: www.imo.org Eng. Frank H. Marmol
Principal Surveyor
Marine Division
Class & Statutory DepartmentIntermaritime Certification Services (ICS Class)
E-mail: [email protected].: (507) 322-0013 / 301-1530 to 1539
Fax: (507) 226-5386 / 301-1540
http://www.icsclass.org 2 attachments — Download all attachments View all images
image001.png
12K View Download
image002

One hundred years ago it would not be even remarkable to hear that even well-found ships had been overwhelmed by seasona...
12/31/2011

One hundred years ago it would not be even remarkable to hear that even well-found ships had been overwhelmed by seasonal storms. A terrible storm in the Atlantic might cause terrible carnage to the fishing fleets of Northern Europe which had been caught out by the weather, far from shelter. Today, we have a far better understanding of the progress of weather with, by and large, excellent and relatively accurate forecasts of anything likely to cause real concern to shipping. Although we are sometime lulled into a false sense of security by the size and power of modern ships and our apparent comprehension of what meteorology might have in store for us on the voyage. Every Winter will give us unpleasant reminders of the power of nature and its unpredictability, confounding all our technology. We have had some already this northern winter. Everyone needs a reminder from time to time of the power of the sea. Mariners need to take the proper precautions, like battening down a ship and making it secure, and ensuring that there are no loose objects that will be thrown around and hurt people or do damage. It seems unnecessary to remind people to secure their furniture, although in modern ships it is unusual to see lashing points under chairs or tables. Perhaps you need to see an armchair thrown across the room to bring the problem home to the designer. Seamanship, it is worth recalling, is as much about anticipation as reaction and fastidiously checking lashings and securing a ship ready for heavy weather is effort well spent. But people ashore also need to be reminded about the colossal ability of nature to make a terrible mess, even if they have not had experience of heavy weather at sea. They too need to take professional warnings seriously and ensure that nobody starts pressurising the Master to leave shelter or asking questions about when he will be under way again. Mariners are the best risk managers in such circumstances and operators need to keep this in mind. By and large, there is a reprehensible tendency today to question the decision making of the Master and operators and charterers need sometimes to remember their respective responsibilities. Naval architects also need to remember that seas are not always smooth and winds balmy and those devices as raised forecastles and poops were there for a purpose, as were long-forgotten features as rise of floor and camber. Heavy green water still does sometimes board quite large ships in extreme weather, and thought needs to be given to the damage it might do once it is on deck. There are some ships which one might think have been almost designed to be vulnerable to pooping, with little freeboard aft, and no absolute guarantee that somebody will have closed and dogged down the hatch into the steering gear or the door into the accommodation. Naval architects rarely seem to get to sea when they are in training, but there is surely a case for some exposure to the elements before they have the responsibility to design things. There are certain places aboard ship where weight can be saved. The weather deck, where all the fittings need strength and solidity, is not a place for weight saving. Storms happen and extreme weather may be nothing like as rare as we might think. Some anticipation all around can be very helpful. Also, view relative videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5LeDPgJEZwHAZARDOUS WEATHER AT SEA - PART 1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q00GVqUaQgE&feature=relatedHAZARDOUS WEATHER AT SEA - PART 2

Documentary / Training about how to avoid hazardous weather at sea - Part 1 of 4.

Address

Montreal, QC

Telephone

514-241-9944

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Antares Marine Consultants, Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Antares Marine Consultants, Inc.:

Share